Which method is known for completing contracts and percentages of completion?

The Cost Comparison Method is associated with completing contracts and percentages of completion because it focuses on evaluating the costs incurred relative to the total estimated costs of a project. This method allows builders and contractors to recognize revenue and expenses based on the proportion of work completed at a specific point in time.

When using the Cost Comparison Method, the actual costs incurred are compared to the total estimated costs to determine the percentage completion of the project. This is particularly useful in long-term contracts and projects where revenue can be recognized progressively as work is completed. This method provides a clearer financial picture and aligns revenue recognition with the actual progress of the work, making it beneficial for budgeting and financial reporting.

The other methods mentioned are not primarily focused on project completion percentages. The Cash Flow Method primarily deals with the movement of cash rather than overall project completion metrics. The Accrual Method focuses on recognizing revenues and expenses when they are earned or incurred, not necessarily tied to the physical completion of work. The Payment Method typically refers to recognizing income based on payments received rather than on the completion of work or costs incurred. Thus, the Cost Comparison Method stands out for its direct application to tracking progress and financial reporting related to project completion.